Skip to main content

What exactly is nothing?| Is there any truth about the concept of nothing?|

 FromQuarkstoQuasarsNewsImage of colliding galaxies. Via Kent E. BiggsIs there anywhere within the Universe where there’s truly nothing? Consider the gaps between stars and galaxies? Or the gaps between atoms? What are the properties of nothing?I want you to require a second and believe nothing. Close your eyes. Picture it in your mind. Focus. Fooooocus. On nothing….It’s pretty hard, isn’t it? Especially once I keep nattering at you. , let’s  consider the vast distance between stars and galaxies, or the small gaps between atoms and other microscopic particles. once we mention nothing within the vast reaches between of space, it’s not actually, technically nothing. Got that? It’s not nothing. There’s… something there.Even within the gulfs of region , there are hundreds or thousands of particles in every kiloliter . But albeit you'll rent MegaMaid from a Dark Helmet surplus store, and vacuum up those particles, there would still be wavelengths of radiation, stretching across vast distances of space.There’s the inevitable reach of gravity stretching across the whole Universe. There’s the weak magnetic flux from a foreign quasar. It’s infinitesimally weak, but it’s not nothing. It’s still something. Philosophers, and a few physicists, argue that *that* nothing isn’t an equivalent as “real” nothing. Different physicists see various things as nothing, from nothing is classical vacuum, to the thought of nothing as undifferentiated potential.Even if you'll remove all the particles, shield against all electric and magnetic fields, some thing your box would always contain and that is , Gravity,  because gravity can never be shielded or cancelled out. Gravity doesn’t get away , and it’s always attractive, so you can’t do anything to dam it. In Newton’s physics that’s because it's a force, but generally relativity space and time *are* gravity.So, imagine if you'll remove all particles, energy, gravity… everything from a system. You’d be left with a real vacuum. Even at its lowest energy state , there are fluctuations within the quantum vacuum of the Universe. There are quantum particles coming  in and out of existence throughout the Universe. There’s nothing, then pop, something, then the particles collide and you’re left with nothing again. And so, albeit you'll remove everything from the Universe, you’d still be left with these quantum fluctuations embedded in spacetime.There are physicists like Lawrence Krauss that argue the “universe from nothing”, really meaning “the universe from a potentiality”. Which comes right down to if you add all the mass and energy within the universe, all the gravitational curvature, everything… it's love it all sums up to zero. So it's possible that the universe really did come from nothing. And if that’s the case, then “nothing” is everything we see around us, and “everything” is nothing.What does one think? How does one wrap your head round the idea of nothing?Keep up. subscribe our daily newsletter.I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its User Agreement and Privacy PolicySubscribe.





Privacy PolicySubscribe

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tsar Bomba | THE LARGEST and most powerful bomb in history of mankind ever created| Hydrogen bomb .

 Tsar Bomba is that the Western nickname for the Soviet RDS-220 H-bomb . Dropped on 30 October, 1945, it is undoubtedly the largest  and most powerful nuclear device ever detonated and making it the most powerful man-made explosion in history. With a yield of fifty megatons of TNT, Tsar Bomba was the culmination of variety of H-bomb tests conducted throughout this point by both the Soviet Union and therefore the us . Tsar Bomba was also mentioned as “Kuzma's mother.” This nickname may ask Nikita Khrushchev's promise made at a 1960 session of the United Nations General Assembly to point out the us a “Kuzkina mat,” which also roughly translates to “We'll show you!” there have been many other nicknames related to Tsar Bomba like Big Ivan, Project 7000, and merchandise Code 202 (Izdeliye 202). The Central intelligence designated the Tsar Bomba nuclear test as “JOE 111.”DesignA team of physicists led by Yuli Khariton designed Tsar Bomba. The team also included Sakharov , Viktor ...